I returned Monday evening from my meeting in Greece over the weekend. It was great to see Thessalonica, even if it was only through the windows cars and buses. I did manage to walk each morning I was there and got to see a little bit more.
Sunday, I had the joy of worshipping with Glad Tiding International Fellowship. It was a great joy to get at least a taste of what heaven will be like. There were so many different people from different places speaking different languages. I sat next to Festus from Nigeria and to a Greek family who spoke a little English. It was a joy to meet these brothers and sisters on this side of eternity. Though I will probably never seem them again before heaven, we will be reunited one day and we will have time to worship the Lord again.
Our experience in the Chicago airport left me doubting the airline company plan for using central hubs. The primary purpose that almost every airline in America and Europe has for going to the central hub concept is to save money. I have no doubt that somewhere there is a slick promotion and expensive study that this is true, but… keep in mind the airline industry in the USA appears to need non-profit status.
Questions keep coming to my mind, like…If central hubs save so much money, why is Southwest, which does not rely solely on a central hub concept, the only financially stable US airline company? Does it really make sense to fly two hours north in order to arrive at a destination that is two hours south? How can it save money for adverse weather in one location to shut down an airline’s schedule across the entire nation?
Economically, central hubs make sense, as well as profit, when there is stability and consistency in ability to produce whatever the hub is designed to do. Wal-Mart, with its profit-making system of inventory control, warehousing through central distribution centers and trucking has made cheap products available to each of us. Airlines rely on weather to keep their central hubs open. Not necessarily consistent or stable. At least, that is part of the reasoning Southwest has for not relying exclusively on this system.
What does this have to do with anything? I think it can go deeper than the advice to buy at Wal-Mart or to fly Southwest or to avoid airport prone to adverse weather. Many people, if fact all of us, base our life on some central concept. The difficulty is that only one is stable and consistent. It affects us in ways we not normally think of.
Many believers have had their faith shipwrecked due to the moral failure of a pastor or spiritual leader. Many marriages within the evangelical church have failed due to irreconcilable differences. Many missionaries become discouraged and go home because their leaders somehow let them down. Many go home because the ground is hard and results are slow.
People will always fail us at some point down the road. This is true within churches, marriages, mission organizations and mission work. It is true in every aspect of life and culture.
The strength of our faith must be found in Christ and Him alone. The strength of my marriage is found in our mutual realization that we will not be able to meet every need the other has. Only Christ can do that. The way to move on when leaders disappoint is that the only reasonable expectation is for others to be imperfect. The only way to stay in an unresponsive place is to rely on God’s call and not the results.